neighbours.” The pro-western tide was turned only when Mao persuaded his own advisers that China must intervene, and sent 300,000 troops to support Kim Il Sung. Mao's baleful influence reappears in 1956. Khrushchev apparently agonised over whether to put down the Hungarian rebellion of that year, and his final decision to send in the troops was made partly “under pressure from Mao Zedong”. Spool forward to 1981 and Mr Gaddis provides a fascinating sketch of the Soviet leadership once again agonising over whether t Air Max 90 crush the sprigs of political liberalism in eastern Europe. This time, they decided against sending troops to crush Poland's Solidarity movement, after receiving advice from their own top brass that, “The Polish armed forces are battle-ready and patriotic. They will not fire on their own people.” Soviet military intervention, warned the Kremlin's Mikhail Suslov, “will mean a catastrophe.”
The American side of the cold war has been familiar for a long time. But even here Mr GReebok easytone,is's mastery of the material, his fluent style and eye for the telling anecdote make his new work a pleasure. The reader comes across plain-speaking Harry Truman worrying privately about the need for a complete change in human nature if the nuclear age was not to be succeeded by the “insect age or an atmosphereless planet”. There is also the sleepless Richard Nixon leaving the White House in the early hours of the morning to argue with anti-Vietnam-war demonstrators gathered under the Lincoln Memorial. And there is the astonishment of George Shultz, a former economics profeReebok Shoes,r turned secretary of state, when he discovers how eager his Soviet counterparts are to learn about the market economy. The didactic Mr Shultz even took to bringing pie charts to the Kremlin, to illustrate his arguments.
As is clear from Mr Shultz's career, the United States has an admirable habit of allowing the best minds in its universities to shape public policy. As one of America's leading historians, Mr Gaddis has been consulted by President George Bush on several occasions—notably just before Mr Bush made his second inaugural speech in which he pledged to “end tyranny” around the world. T kobe 6 grinch,he admiration is mutual. Unusually for an Ivy League eminence, Mr Gaddis backed the Iraq war and praised the Bush administration for the boldness and vision of its foreign policy. And while he is too conscientious an historian to allow his political views to intrude upon his narrative of the cold war, a few minor passages hint at his real feelings: a trace of irritation in his account of General de Gaulle's anti-Americanism and an obvious admiraNike lebron 8 south beachor the clarity and simplicity of the ideas of Ronald Reagan.
没有评论:
发表评论